Writing in 1926, Fr. Maximilian Kolbe reveals the deep antipathy Judaism has for Christianity which, not content with its perfidy, devolved further into Talmudism
I want to thank you for publishing this series on Fr. Kolbe's writings. Even though his warnings about the Synagogue of Satan (Rev. 2:9 & 3:9) aka Freemasonry were written 100 years ago, they are still relevant today.
"Owing to my theological position on the present status of Authority in the Catholic Church, The Cassiaciacum Thesis, I do not regard Fr. Maximillian Kolbe to be a Saint, publicly. This is not to be viewed as a “knock” against him or an “insult” to his legacy."
I am asking because I do not fully understand your position, but how do you reconcile your theological position with our Lord's words, "the gates of Hell will not prevail against it [the Church]."?
Who is the visible head of the Church Jesus founded, if not the Bishop of Rome? If there is no valid Bishop of Rome then there is no Church, no Apostolic Succession, and there never was. So if not Leo XIV, then who is the valid Bishop of Rome?
It has been prophesied by some mystics that Rome would lose the Faith, and all will appear lost. It appears this may have already come to pass, if your theological position is the correct one, OR it is very soon to happen... I am not certain which is correct, but the "Pontificate" of Francis introduced confusion and division rather than "confirming his brothers in the faith", like no other pontificate in the history of the Church.
If Rome loses the faith as prophesied, who carries the torch going forward? Obviously, when the Jews lost the faith, the Gentiles were chosen to carry the torch from the capitol of the Roman Empire. There is always a Divine Plan. The Magisterium is supposed to have a visible head. I have heard stories of Islamists in the Middle East converting to Christianity through mystical experiences, not unlike the Apostle Paul, being visited by Jesus.
There is a lot here to respond to which I am happy to do. If you could please, first, read this (brief) overview of the theological position, which is predicated on the doctrines taught at Vatican II and in the subsequent reforms: https://thethesis.us/
I think this will answer many of your questions. After which, please send me a PM and I will be happy to continue the conversation. As a final point, those of us that hold the Cassiciacum Thesis maintain the validity of the election of Leo XIV, but say he is only Pope materially, not formally (i.e. no habitual Authority).
Re: "And I say to thee: That thou art Peter; and upon this rock I will build my church, and the gates of hell shall not prevail against it.", (Matthew 16:18).
It seems to me, and I could be wrong; whether you embrace the Sedevacantist position (material and formal vacancy of the chair of Peter) or the view which holds that currently there is a Pope materially but not formally, (sometimes referred to as Sedeprevationism, or the Cassiciacum Thesis) your question is valid. It is in my mind and I struggle with it.
I don't know how to harmonize our current situation with Matthew 16:18 without resorting to some sort of exegetical massaging which seems incompatible with the literal sense of the text. Christ is speaking to Peter (Petros, which means rock), He calls him the rock (the stable foundation so to speak) upon which He will build His Church. Then He says the gates of Hell (assumed to be referring to Satan), will not prevail (permanently conquer/destroy/defeat) against His Church.
I suppose it is possible to debate what the word "prevail" means in the context of Christ's statement. If it is assumed to mean "permanently defeat/destroy/conquer, then our current situation has not violated Christ's statement. If it is taken to mean a temporary devastating apostasy (Rome has lost the faith, the last 7 popes have been antipopes, Vatican II brought about a total break with Traditional Catholicism and formation of a different religion), then it appears Christ's words have been violated.
If we focus on the word "church", recognizing that there is a church militant on earth, a church suffering (in purgatory) and the church triumphant in heaven, only the church triumphant can be said to possibly have been conquered by Satan (church being used in the aggregate sense, not in terms of each individual person). Since much of the church under this rubric is intact (in heaven and purgatory) except for Rome, the episcopacy and much of the laity throughout the world who think the conciliar church is Catholic, maybe that is enough to conclude that the gates of Hell have not prevailed.
Another view is to say that as long as there are still individual "true" Catholics alive on earth, attempting to practice their faith, then Satan has not prevailed even though Rome, it's bishops and Priests in communion with it, remain in apostasy.
There have been interregnums before where the chair of Peter was temporarily vacant and then restored. The current interregnum (~68 years) seems too long by comparison. The question then becomes, how much longer can this continue before it is logically necessary to conclude that even though there are individual traditional Catholics still alive and practicing their faith as best they can, Satan has prevailed because Rome/episcopacy/priesthood remains apostate? This question is more relevant to the Sedeprevationist position since it has a theoretical mechanism by which the traditional faith could be restored. The Sedevacantist position seems to assume that the return of Christ is reasonably imminent and that the traditional Catholic faith will not be restored in Rome (opinion only) prior to HIs arrival. One is hard-pressed to posit a mechanism for restoration if one adopts the Sedevacantist position.
I was a child prior to the Vatican II disaster and know from experience how wonderful the true Catholic Church was back then. Speaking only from a personal perspective, what is called Roman Catholicism now, is a different religion. Christ said "by their fruits you shall know them.", (Matthew 7:16,20). The fruits since Vatican II have been uniformly bad. The power of Zionism and Talmudic Judaism have grown exponentially since then as one would expect to happen if Rome lost the faith after 1958.
Thanks for not mentionong that Kolbe was a Catholic Polish nationalist, with ties to the National Radical Camp Party, which he was an active supporter of, like his order too. It’s believed his order began their ties with the National Radical Camp while he was away on missionary work. He never severed those ties upon his return.There is no data to suggest otherwise. It’s unlikely such an alliance would have been made without Kolbe’s knowledge and approval. National Radical Camp were a nationalist, anti-jewish, or anti-talmudic, whatever you wish to call it, party.
Kolbe is part German. Kolbe is a German name. A year after Kolbe’s passing, the Church’s official paper mentioned him in a memorial. No martyrdom stated or alluded to. The church was informed of Kolbe’s death and cause after he died. They know the truth, and it’s not what has been preached, ad nauseum, since AFTER WW2.
Soviets, finally, in the late 80s provided the documentation, stating Kolbe’s cause of death. Starvation was not it, neither was a lethal injection. Soviets claim that the documents they stole were destroyed by the NS. Yes, that’s why the Soviets can produce the documents, over 40 years later.
JP2 streamlined the canonization process in the early 80s, after all, he had many prospective Saints to declare. Don’t get me wrong, Kolbe’s sainthood is not being questioned, everything else is. It’s the omissions regarding the Kolbe fable that are most interesting.
(Source consulted: Diana Dewar, 1982, 'Saint of Auschwitz: The Story of Maksymilian Kolbe', 1st Edition, Darton, Longman and Todd: London.)
I have heard of Trzeciak and his comments. I won’t say anything more about him.The Poles and their tales are a cause of much annoyance to me, and their “Pope”. They’ve done enough damage, to so many. Not all, but the really frustrating, liberal ones have, and still do. The only struggle I can see is against the Polish duplicity. That was clear, even in WW2.
I see your point. All acts of this false Church born out of a Satanic "Council" - including its "canonisations" of true saints like Father Kolbe - should be reviewed when the True Church will have ousted all those imposters, reclaimed her Vatican and "restored everything in Jesus Christ" like Saint Pius X said.
Appreciate your looking into the relationship between Catholicism and National Socialism. It's big, complicated and messier than any of us can truly imagine. I look forward to reading more of your work.
Again, following my earlier question regarding your stated Theological position regarding the Church's Authority, where does your position allow for those of us who were Baptized and Confirmed in the post- VII Conciliar ecclesial community that Rome claims, albeit invalidly, to be the very same Church of the first 19 1/2 Centuries? Does not your position put ALL of us in an unbaptized, unconfirmed pseudo-protestant and abiguous community without valid sacraments?
Where is, and who is the visible head of the Church if he is not visible, but is not Jesus Himself Who is the Invisible Head? Who lays - and has lain - claim to the See of Peter, for the last 60 or so years if Leo XIV is not valid?
Where is the prophesy from Scripture and Tradition that says "there will be a period of no less than 60 years wherein there will be no one to Shepherd my Church, you will just have to sort the lies from the Truth yourself."?
I do not hold to sedevacantism to explain the current Crisis in the Church so many of these things are not relevant to the position. There is no "Vatican II church" nor does my theological position rest on private revelation.
Sorry, I was not seeing the notifications of your replies. My apologies. Please be clear: I truly am having many questions about the mass confusion and division coming from within the walls of the Vatican. I am not trying to do a "gotcha". My questions really are about eternity and how and where I lead my own family whom God has entrusted to my care.
This information, recently sent to a friend asking similar questions should help you:
I firmly believe that the teaching of Father Gregory Hesse will assist in achieving some objectivity as regards the problems of V2 and the new rites of 1969 in a manner that is orthodox, charitable and an accurate reflection of truth, subordinated to He Who is Truth Himself, therefore must have established His divine religion in truth that can be discovered, understood and assented to without compromise and without substantial change.
Fr Hesse was a double doctor, of canon law and Scholastic thought and is widely respected.
In sum he:
1. Was ordained in the new rite, in Latin
2. Never sought conditional reordination (and why not is key and explained at length)
3. Repented of ever saying the novus ordo and would after only say the true Mass
4. Was a friend of Mons Wach, ICKSP prior general
5. Friendly and collaborated with the SSPX
His video talks are first rate, they can be found here:
Nowhere is the confusion thicker and harder than regarding Nazi Germany and its history. There are a lot of moving parts here. For his part, the Austrian Painter was a Bankster Puppet and this Wolf is now becoming familiar with the names of his handlers, some from Britain and others from the United States, who were also known to such figures as Franklin Roosevelt and Winston Churchill, two other Bankster Puppets. That all the politicians and military leaders of WW2 were nothing but a gaggle of puppets and yes-men following orders from higher powers- guess who those are?- is now abundantly clear.
All that being said, many within the ranks of the Nazi party were honorable men who felt they had to shake hands with the devil, so to speak, to fight Bolshevism, which they rightfully regarded as the greatest menace to the commonweal. It is tragic, of course, that both the church leadership and the clergy in general failed to understand the APocalyptic importance of the events of Fatima, and insist that the popes heed Our Lady's requests. A lot can be said about Pius XII, but the bottom line is that he opted for a humanitarian and political solution to a supernatural problem. (Or he was in on it, which seems far more likely.)
As for the Holohoax, it is all 1000% fake and ghey, from the gassings to the lampshades to the so-called "Final Solution".
So it does not surprise me at all that Maximillian Kolbe's "martyrdom" is a complete fabrication.
In the Holy and Sorrowful Hearts of Jesus and Mary.
Timber Wolf, more like Toothless Wolf. Not one source cited for the claims. Likely a Sutton, Bjerknes disciple. Sutton, the British American Hoover Institute operative.Not an association worth boasting about. I think the Mises Institute hold him in some regard. Who can forget the conversation between Elizabeth Clare Prophet and Sutton at the Summit University Forum, on 28th February 1984.. Elizabeth Clare Prophet, the leader of Christian sect (the Church Universal and Triumphant, a New Age outfit. Again, neither inspires confidence
.
Elizabeth Clare Prophet explored Kabbalah in her teachings and authored a book titled "Kabbalah: Key to Your Inner Power," which presents the mystical tradition in an accessible way. Summit University Forum was part of Elizabeth Clare Prophet's group. It was a core educational and outreach component of the Church Universal and Triumphant (CUT) and its publishing arm, The Summit Lighthouse.Why is a "respected" historian, economist attending such a Forum? A New Age Forum at thar. Is it good for his career, like the Hoover Institute was?
Bjerknes is just not worth discussing. He is the mindless popular podcaster-"researcher's" absolute favourite. He does ALL your research and thinking for you.
Also, as to where I am coming from, I would prefer the TLM be restored to it's rightful place as the Ordinary Form and the Novus Orbi Ordo Mass be archived in the basement of the Vatican vault as the biggest mistake next to the sacking of Constantinople.
The problem is that the church can’t give us an evil fallible form of worship. So repealing or correcting v2 or the NO makes no sense. It must be admitted that whatever created v2 and the no was not the rcc
I don’t know. And you don’t have to admit anything; thanks for calling that out. What i can’t understand is that if v2 church is the Catholic Church, then why so much bellyaching? Go to it and let that be the end of it. It’s not to me; the best I can do is recuse myself until I’m more certain.
That’s left me without the internal battles and complaining that some people make money off of and others get addicted to
It’s a mess; a total mess. Only the devil could have created so much chaos ; that’s why I’ve left the game. I pray at home. I’ll say this too; I’ve made more spiritual progress in 5 years praying at home than the 7-8 in the v2 church or trad movement
What does your theological position say about all those FSSP communities that have Priests who were ordained in the post-concilliar period, but celebrate the Traditional Latin Mass? Their celebration of the TLM is invalid and illicit, and everyone Baptized and Confirmed by those men would be in the same pseudo-protestant state of ambiguity and apostasy, yes? Am I now understanding your theological position of the ecclesial community called "Roman Catholic" without a true shepherd to lead the flock thereof? Where in Sacred Tradition of the Fathers do we find support for your theological position?
IF MOSES WERE TO SEE A COPY OF THE MASORETIC TEXT, HE WOULDN’T BE ABLE TO READ IT.
A Radically Different Alphabet
As discussed in this recent post, the original Old Testament scriptures were written in Paleo-Hebrew, a text closely related to the ancient Phonecian writing system.
The Masoretic Text is written with an alphabet which was borrowed from Assyria (Persia) around the 6th-7th century B.C., and is almost 1000 years newer than the form of writing used by Moses, David, and most of the Old Testament authors.
The observation about the friendliness of Protestants to the designs of Jewry is well documented and very real, the two often allying against a common, Catholic enemy.
In regard to the third paragraph: it's a very good question and, in the context of an individualistic (i.e. we are merely individuals) paradigm, it does not make sense and it does seem immoral to lump people together like that. However, when we recognize that man is social, by his very nature, it becomes clear that we are bound up in groups, whether familial, racial, national, interest-based, etc. There are troublesome and antisocial races, noting that certain (exceptional) members do not exhibit that behavior, just like there are kind and particularly generous families or neighborhoods. Each group has an overall tendency, which can be observed and is confirmed by practical experience.
Recall in the Old Testament that God cursed and blessed entire bloodlines, in addition to the great commission in the New Testament by which the Apostles were to preach the Gospel to "all nations", not merely individuals.
The Jews, as a corporate entity, an organized (it is not always neat) social, political and religious force, are comprised of both leaders and followers. In any group, the leaders are to receive the most blame when things go wrong, or conversely, the credit when things go right. The followers, insofar are they are in solidarity with their leaders participate in the decisions, right or wrong, with the latter. It is a collective responsibility, that is participated in morally, even if individual Jews are not directly involving themselves. So, it is in that sense that I and historical Catholic authors refer to "the Jews".
Msgr. Jouin was asked a similar question and answered thusly in 1932:
"Let no one say, as some Christians do, who are dupes or accomplices: ‘Fight against such and such Jews who form the High Bank, against such and such other Jews who lead the revolution. But do not confuse the good and the bad in the mass.’ Miserable ambiguity. It is the entire Jewish race ‘en masse’ that is in solidarity with this Jewish program. Be on your guard against the Jewish and Judaized press, Jewish individuals in power, and all the base scum of the Eastern ghettos; all are in solidarity with this deleterious work. A thousand Jewish documents (and every day brings us new ones) proclaim that the Jewish race must put itself at the head of the world, and a thousand facts prove that it pursues this goal with implacable tenacity. Are there honest Jewish individuals who are foreign to this program? Certainly, and we will hasten to exclude them from the fight as soon as they make themselves known, they have one of the easiest ways: Let them fight the Jewish peril not only with words but with deeds. Otherwise, no.”
Truisms about mathematics may be true for numbers and other abstract symbols, but such a clean-cut mechanical approach is hardly valid for cases where human beings are involved.
Full disclosure, I liked your original post. I also share your concern about hating Jews, which is not an option for any follower of Our Lord. However, one can hate the Talmud, and deplore the deleterious effect that it has had on the mindset of the Jewish people as a whole, not just of individuals.
“The Jews “ are too dangerous for European lands. They are not European. They are aliens. That’s enough; this “we can vet them” is naive and ultimately cowardly: the grip of synthetic ww2 morality won’t disappear overnight. Jews play both sides and they don’t mind lying. That prof is lying. He’s playing off the success of turning whites into individuals while allowing all other races to team up. Classic Jewish moves. “The best and the worst,” that sounds like pure Jewish rhetoric.
Emj had some very strange ideas about race. He has a manichean odor to him. Like he thinks the body is of no consequence. But Aristotle says we learn , unlike angels, through our bodies. So wouldn’t different bodies learn and eventually know in different ways? Emjs use of the term logos rather than just Jesus kinda betrays this tendency. Why not just say Jesus? Jesus is rising?
And how does he explain Greece and Rome? I’ve never heard him confront how an Aristotle and a cicero or their civilization s could exist without the gospel.
I don’t known if you are American but we need a homeland to work our problems without this albatross of “race” constantly in our faces. Jews will never let that be. As long as they are here they will cause trouble , and yes our people cause trouble to o but they can’t say it’s because of something they can’t change , their race.
Actually, getting white women under control would do more than exporting all the Jews haha!
You are approaching the world in a liberal way. You see the world as a collection of individual humanoids that embrace or reject ideas. Whites are the only group that thinks this way. Jews are not white, friend! They don’t think this way. They lie and say they do when it suits them just like they lie and say they are white when it suits them. So what you are really asking is are there Jews that want to be traitors to their own people and help their hosts? Perhaps be granted honorary white status. Maybe but who cares? When whites shrug off this autogenocidal enlightenment straitjacket and start advocating for whites as whites, then it’s possible to use a foreign individual to advance white interests, sure. Why not.
Maybe after 100 years of no Jews in America we could use a few as entertainers or something like that; but because there are still treacherously naive whites who think in this individualistic way, allowing into our country a group that has been exploiting white good nature for 20 centuries is too dangerous.
"It is important to remember that Judaism is not Old Testament religion, but rather a rejection of the Biblical faith altogether in favor of the Pharisaical, Talmudic heresy.
Like Mormons, Jehovah’s Witnesses, the Unification Church, and other cults, it claims to be based on the Bible; but its actual authority comes from the traditions of men. Jesus was quite clear: Judaism denies Christ because it denies Moses. Orthodox Christianity alone is the true continuation and fulfillment of Old Testament religion (see Matt. 5:17-20; 15:1-9; Mark 7:1-13; Luke 16:29-31; John 5:45-47; 8:42-47).”
I want to thank you for publishing this series on Fr. Kolbe's writings. Even though his warnings about the Synagogue of Satan (Rev. 2:9 & 3:9) aka Freemasonry were written 100 years ago, they are still relevant today.
"Owing to my theological position on the present status of Authority in the Catholic Church, The Cassiaciacum Thesis, I do not regard Fr. Maximillian Kolbe to be a Saint, publicly. This is not to be viewed as a “knock” against him or an “insult” to his legacy."
I am asking because I do not fully understand your position, but how do you reconcile your theological position with our Lord's words, "the gates of Hell will not prevail against it [the Church]."?
Who is the visible head of the Church Jesus founded, if not the Bishop of Rome? If there is no valid Bishop of Rome then there is no Church, no Apostolic Succession, and there never was. So if not Leo XIV, then who is the valid Bishop of Rome?
It has been prophesied by some mystics that Rome would lose the Faith, and all will appear lost. It appears this may have already come to pass, if your theological position is the correct one, OR it is very soon to happen... I am not certain which is correct, but the "Pontificate" of Francis introduced confusion and division rather than "confirming his brothers in the faith", like no other pontificate in the history of the Church.
If Rome loses the faith as prophesied, who carries the torch going forward? Obviously, when the Jews lost the faith, the Gentiles were chosen to carry the torch from the capitol of the Roman Empire. There is always a Divine Plan. The Magisterium is supposed to have a visible head. I have heard stories of Islamists in the Middle East converting to Christianity through mystical experiences, not unlike the Apostle Paul, being visited by Jesus.
Thank you for the clarifying questions.
There is a lot here to respond to which I am happy to do. If you could please, first, read this (brief) overview of the theological position, which is predicated on the doctrines taught at Vatican II and in the subsequent reforms: https://thethesis.us/
The big problems with Vatican II are catalogued here: https://thethesis.us/chapter-ii/
I think this will answer many of your questions. After which, please send me a PM and I will be happy to continue the conversation. As a final point, those of us that hold the Cassiciacum Thesis maintain the validity of the election of Leo XIV, but say he is only Pope materially, not formally (i.e. no habitual Authority).
Okay. I will read through the document. I just need answers.
Re: "And I say to thee: That thou art Peter; and upon this rock I will build my church, and the gates of hell shall not prevail against it.", (Matthew 16:18).
It seems to me, and I could be wrong; whether you embrace the Sedevacantist position (material and formal vacancy of the chair of Peter) or the view which holds that currently there is a Pope materially but not formally, (sometimes referred to as Sedeprevationism, or the Cassiciacum Thesis) your question is valid. It is in my mind and I struggle with it.
I don't know how to harmonize our current situation with Matthew 16:18 without resorting to some sort of exegetical massaging which seems incompatible with the literal sense of the text. Christ is speaking to Peter (Petros, which means rock), He calls him the rock (the stable foundation so to speak) upon which He will build His Church. Then He says the gates of Hell (assumed to be referring to Satan), will not prevail (permanently conquer/destroy/defeat) against His Church.
I suppose it is possible to debate what the word "prevail" means in the context of Christ's statement. If it is assumed to mean "permanently defeat/destroy/conquer, then our current situation has not violated Christ's statement. If it is taken to mean a temporary devastating apostasy (Rome has lost the faith, the last 7 popes have been antipopes, Vatican II brought about a total break with Traditional Catholicism and formation of a different religion), then it appears Christ's words have been violated.
If we focus on the word "church", recognizing that there is a church militant on earth, a church suffering (in purgatory) and the church triumphant in heaven, only the church triumphant can be said to possibly have been conquered by Satan (church being used in the aggregate sense, not in terms of each individual person). Since much of the church under this rubric is intact (in heaven and purgatory) except for Rome, the episcopacy and much of the laity throughout the world who think the conciliar church is Catholic, maybe that is enough to conclude that the gates of Hell have not prevailed.
Another view is to say that as long as there are still individual "true" Catholics alive on earth, attempting to practice their faith, then Satan has not prevailed even though Rome, it's bishops and Priests in communion with it, remain in apostasy.
There have been interregnums before where the chair of Peter was temporarily vacant and then restored. The current interregnum (~68 years) seems too long by comparison. The question then becomes, how much longer can this continue before it is logically necessary to conclude that even though there are individual traditional Catholics still alive and practicing their faith as best they can, Satan has prevailed because Rome/episcopacy/priesthood remains apostate? This question is more relevant to the Sedeprevationist position since it has a theoretical mechanism by which the traditional faith could be restored. The Sedevacantist position seems to assume that the return of Christ is reasonably imminent and that the traditional Catholic faith will not be restored in Rome (opinion only) prior to HIs arrival. One is hard-pressed to posit a mechanism for restoration if one adopts the Sedevacantist position.
I was a child prior to the Vatican II disaster and know from experience how wonderful the true Catholic Church was back then. Speaking only from a personal perspective, what is called Roman Catholicism now, is a different religion. Christ said "by their fruits you shall know them.", (Matthew 7:16,20). The fruits since Vatican II have been uniformly bad. The power of Zionism and Talmudic Judaism have grown exponentially since then as one would expect to happen if Rome lost the faith after 1958.
Thanks for not mentionong that Kolbe was a Catholic Polish nationalist, with ties to the National Radical Camp Party, which he was an active supporter of, like his order too. It’s believed his order began their ties with the National Radical Camp while he was away on missionary work. He never severed those ties upon his return.There is no data to suggest otherwise. It’s unlikely such an alliance would have been made without Kolbe’s knowledge and approval. National Radical Camp were a nationalist, anti-jewish, or anti-talmudic, whatever you wish to call it, party.
Kolbe is part German. Kolbe is a German name. A year after Kolbe’s passing, the Church’s official paper mentioned him in a memorial. No martyrdom stated or alluded to. The church was informed of Kolbe’s death and cause after he died. They know the truth, and it’s not what has been preached, ad nauseum, since AFTER WW2.
Soviets, finally, in the late 80s provided the documentation, stating Kolbe’s cause of death. Starvation was not it, neither was a lethal injection. Soviets claim that the documents they stole were destroyed by the NS. Yes, that’s why the Soviets can produce the documents, over 40 years later.
JP2 streamlined the canonization process in the early 80s, after all, he had many prospective Saints to declare. Don’t get me wrong, Kolbe’s sainthood is not being questioned, everything else is. It’s the omissions regarding the Kolbe fable that are most interesting.
(Source consulted: Diana Dewar, 1982, 'Saint of Auschwitz: The Story of Maksymilian Kolbe', 1st Edition, Darton, Longman and Todd: London.)
I mentioned his ties — in passing — to a member of the NRC, Rev. Dr. Trzeciak in another essay of mine.
I also do not doubt Kolbe’s holiness, only the circumstances surrounding his death. Thank you for the additional information.
https://americanreform.substack.com/p/the-great-pope-benedict-xiv-and-the?r=4n45yp&utm_medium=ios
I have heard of Trzeciak and his comments. I won’t say anything more about him.The Poles and their tales are a cause of much annoyance to me, and their “Pope”. They’ve done enough damage, to so many. Not all, but the really frustrating, liberal ones have, and still do. The only struggle I can see is against the Polish duplicity. That was clear, even in WW2.
I see your point. All acts of this false Church born out of a Satanic "Council" - including its "canonisations" of true saints like Father Kolbe - should be reviewed when the True Church will have ousted all those imposters, reclaimed her Vatican and "restored everything in Jesus Christ" like Saint Pius X said.
Appreciate your looking into the relationship between Catholicism and National Socialism. It's big, complicated and messier than any of us can truly imagine. I look forward to reading more of your work.
Again, following my earlier question regarding your stated Theological position regarding the Church's Authority, where does your position allow for those of us who were Baptized and Confirmed in the post- VII Conciliar ecclesial community that Rome claims, albeit invalidly, to be the very same Church of the first 19 1/2 Centuries? Does not your position put ALL of us in an unbaptized, unconfirmed pseudo-protestant and abiguous community without valid sacraments?
Where is, and who is the visible head of the Church if he is not visible, but is not Jesus Himself Who is the Invisible Head? Who lays - and has lain - claim to the See of Peter, for the last 60 or so years if Leo XIV is not valid?
Where is the prophesy from Scripture and Tradition that says "there will be a period of no less than 60 years wherein there will be no one to Shepherd my Church, you will just have to sort the lies from the Truth yourself."?
I do not hold to sedevacantism to explain the current Crisis in the Church so many of these things are not relevant to the position. There is no "Vatican II church" nor does my theological position rest on private revelation.
Please see my recent reply to you.
Sorry, I was not seeing the notifications of your replies. My apologies. Please be clear: I truly am having many questions about the mass confusion and division coming from within the walls of the Vatican. I am not trying to do a "gotcha". My questions really are about eternity and how and where I lead my own family whom God has entrusted to my care.
This information, recently sent to a friend asking similar questions should help you:
I firmly believe that the teaching of Father Gregory Hesse will assist in achieving some objectivity as regards the problems of V2 and the new rites of 1969 in a manner that is orthodox, charitable and an accurate reflection of truth, subordinated to He Who is Truth Himself, therefore must have established His divine religion in truth that can be discovered, understood and assented to without compromise and without substantial change.
Fr Hesse was a double doctor, of canon law and Scholastic thought and is widely respected.
In sum he:
1. Was ordained in the new rite, in Latin
2. Never sought conditional reordination (and why not is key and explained at length)
3. Repented of ever saying the novus ordo and would after only say the true Mass
4. Was a friend of Mons Wach, ICKSP prior general
5. Friendly and collaborated with the SSPX
His video talks are first rate, they can be found here:
https://www.bitchute.com/video/zSzMAhbFRHvB
All my comments to you are "hidden". Free Speech in a nutshell. I don't even know if you have received my comments.
Nowhere is the confusion thicker and harder than regarding Nazi Germany and its history. There are a lot of moving parts here. For his part, the Austrian Painter was a Bankster Puppet and this Wolf is now becoming familiar with the names of his handlers, some from Britain and others from the United States, who were also known to such figures as Franklin Roosevelt and Winston Churchill, two other Bankster Puppets. That all the politicians and military leaders of WW2 were nothing but a gaggle of puppets and yes-men following orders from higher powers- guess who those are?- is now abundantly clear.
All that being said, many within the ranks of the Nazi party were honorable men who felt they had to shake hands with the devil, so to speak, to fight Bolshevism, which they rightfully regarded as the greatest menace to the commonweal. It is tragic, of course, that both the church leadership and the clergy in general failed to understand the APocalyptic importance of the events of Fatima, and insist that the popes heed Our Lady's requests. A lot can be said about Pius XII, but the bottom line is that he opted for a humanitarian and political solution to a supernatural problem. (Or he was in on it, which seems far more likely.)
As for the Holohoax, it is all 1000% fake and ghey, from the gassings to the lampshades to the so-called "Final Solution".
So it does not surprise me at all that Maximillian Kolbe's "martyrdom" is a complete fabrication.
In the Holy and Sorrowful Hearts of Jesus and Mary.
Timber Wolf, more like Toothless Wolf. Not one source cited for the claims. Likely a Sutton, Bjerknes disciple. Sutton, the British American Hoover Institute operative.Not an association worth boasting about. I think the Mises Institute hold him in some regard. Who can forget the conversation between Elizabeth Clare Prophet and Sutton at the Summit University Forum, on 28th February 1984.. Elizabeth Clare Prophet, the leader of Christian sect (the Church Universal and Triumphant, a New Age outfit. Again, neither inspires confidence
.
Elizabeth Clare Prophet explored Kabbalah in her teachings and authored a book titled "Kabbalah: Key to Your Inner Power," which presents the mystical tradition in an accessible way. Summit University Forum was part of Elizabeth Clare Prophet's group. It was a core educational and outreach component of the Church Universal and Triumphant (CUT) and its publishing arm, The Summit Lighthouse.Why is a "respected" historian, economist attending such a Forum? A New Age Forum at thar. Is it good for his career, like the Hoover Institute was?
Bjerknes is just not worth discussing. He is the mindless popular podcaster-"researcher's" absolute favourite. He does ALL your research and thinking for you.
If Elizabeth Clare wants to consort with demons that is her prerogative. But it will not end well come Judgment Day.
Also, as to where I am coming from, I would prefer the TLM be restored to it's rightful place as the Ordinary Form and the Novus Orbi Ordo Mass be archived in the basement of the Vatican vault as the biggest mistake next to the sacking of Constantinople.
The problem is that the church can’t give us an evil fallible form of worship. So repealing or correcting v2 or the NO makes no sense. It must be admitted that whatever created v2 and the no was not the rcc
If it wasn't the RCC, then what was it? How were so many good holy priests and bishops fooled by the scam?
I don’t know. And you don’t have to admit anything; thanks for calling that out. What i can’t understand is that if v2 church is the Catholic Church, then why so much bellyaching? Go to it and let that be the end of it. It’s not to me; the best I can do is recuse myself until I’m more certain.
That’s left me without the internal battles and complaining that some people make money off of and others get addicted to
It is circular argumentation at this point. It's like we're caught in a Round-About, and the construction barries are blocking all of the exits.
It’s a mess; a total mess. Only the devil could have created so much chaos ; that’s why I’ve left the game. I pray at home. I’ll say this too; I’ve made more spiritual progress in 5 years praying at home than the 7-8 in the v2 church or trad movement
That kinda sounds like political double-speak to me. It must be admitted by whom?
What does your theological position say about all those FSSP communities that have Priests who were ordained in the post-concilliar period, but celebrate the Traditional Latin Mass? Their celebration of the TLM is invalid and illicit, and everyone Baptized and Confirmed by those men would be in the same pseudo-protestant state of ambiguity and apostasy, yes? Am I now understanding your theological position of the ecclesial community called "Roman Catholic" without a true shepherd to lead the flock thereof? Where in Sacred Tradition of the Fathers do we find support for your theological position?
I have so many questions, but you remain silent.
IF MOSES WERE TO SEE A COPY OF THE MASORETIC TEXT, HE WOULDN’T BE ABLE TO READ IT.
A Radically Different Alphabet
As discussed in this recent post, the original Old Testament scriptures were written in Paleo-Hebrew, a text closely related to the ancient Phonecian writing system.
The Masoretic Text is written with an alphabet which was borrowed from Assyria (Persia) around the 6th-7th century B.C., and is almost 1000 years newer than the form of writing used by Moses, David, and most of the Old Testament authors.
https://arizonaorthodox.com/2017/11/masoretic-text-vs-original-hebrew/
Wow, fascinating... will finish reading later. More massaging of truth to whitewash Talmudic evil for Roman Catholics? Say it isn't so!
The observation about the friendliness of Protestants to the designs of Jewry is well documented and very real, the two often allying against a common, Catholic enemy.
In regard to the third paragraph: it's a very good question and, in the context of an individualistic (i.e. we are merely individuals) paradigm, it does not make sense and it does seem immoral to lump people together like that. However, when we recognize that man is social, by his very nature, it becomes clear that we are bound up in groups, whether familial, racial, national, interest-based, etc. There are troublesome and antisocial races, noting that certain (exceptional) members do not exhibit that behavior, just like there are kind and particularly generous families or neighborhoods. Each group has an overall tendency, which can be observed and is confirmed by practical experience.
Recall in the Old Testament that God cursed and blessed entire bloodlines, in addition to the great commission in the New Testament by which the Apostles were to preach the Gospel to "all nations", not merely individuals.
The Jews, as a corporate entity, an organized (it is not always neat) social, political and religious force, are comprised of both leaders and followers. In any group, the leaders are to receive the most blame when things go wrong, or conversely, the credit when things go right. The followers, insofar are they are in solidarity with their leaders participate in the decisions, right or wrong, with the latter. It is a collective responsibility, that is participated in morally, even if individual Jews are not directly involving themselves. So, it is in that sense that I and historical Catholic authors refer to "the Jews".
Msgr. Jouin was asked a similar question and answered thusly in 1932:
"Let no one say, as some Christians do, who are dupes or accomplices: ‘Fight against such and such Jews who form the High Bank, against such and such other Jews who lead the revolution. But do not confuse the good and the bad in the mass.’ Miserable ambiguity. It is the entire Jewish race ‘en masse’ that is in solidarity with this Jewish program. Be on your guard against the Jewish and Judaized press, Jewish individuals in power, and all the base scum of the Eastern ghettos; all are in solidarity with this deleterious work. A thousand Jewish documents (and every day brings us new ones) proclaim that the Jewish race must put itself at the head of the world, and a thousand facts prove that it pursues this goal with implacable tenacity. Are there honest Jewish individuals who are foreign to this program? Certainly, and we will hasten to exclude them from the fight as soon as they make themselves known, they have one of the easiest ways: Let them fight the Jewish peril not only with words but with deeds. Otherwise, no.”
If you're interested in reading more, I would suggest this commentary from the same French prelate, Jouin: https://open.substack.com/pub/americanreform/p/a-catholic-commentary-on-the-protocols?r=4n45yp&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web&showWelcomeOnShare=false
Truisms about mathematics may be true for numbers and other abstract symbols, but such a clean-cut mechanical approach is hardly valid for cases where human beings are involved.
Full disclosure, I liked your original post. I also share your concern about hating Jews, which is not an option for any follower of Our Lord. However, one can hate the Talmud, and deplore the deleterious effect that it has had on the mindset of the Jewish people as a whole, not just of individuals.
“The Jews “ are too dangerous for European lands. They are not European. They are aliens. That’s enough; this “we can vet them” is naive and ultimately cowardly: the grip of synthetic ww2 morality won’t disappear overnight. Jews play both sides and they don’t mind lying. That prof is lying. He’s playing off the success of turning whites into individuals while allowing all other races to team up. Classic Jewish moves. “The best and the worst,” that sounds like pure Jewish rhetoric.
Emj had some very strange ideas about race. He has a manichean odor to him. Like he thinks the body is of no consequence. But Aristotle says we learn , unlike angels, through our bodies. So wouldn’t different bodies learn and eventually know in different ways? Emjs use of the term logos rather than just Jesus kinda betrays this tendency. Why not just say Jesus? Jesus is rising?
And how does he explain Greece and Rome? I’ve never heard him confront how an Aristotle and a cicero or their civilization s could exist without the gospel.
I don’t known if you are American but we need a homeland to work our problems without this albatross of “race” constantly in our faces. Jews will never let that be. As long as they are here they will cause trouble , and yes our people cause trouble to o but they can’t say it’s because of something they can’t change , their race.
Actually, getting white women under control would do more than exporting all the Jews haha!
You are approaching the world in a liberal way. You see the world as a collection of individual humanoids that embrace or reject ideas. Whites are the only group that thinks this way. Jews are not white, friend! They don’t think this way. They lie and say they do when it suits them just like they lie and say they are white when it suits them. So what you are really asking is are there Jews that want to be traitors to their own people and help their hosts? Perhaps be granted honorary white status. Maybe but who cares? When whites shrug off this autogenocidal enlightenment straitjacket and start advocating for whites as whites, then it’s possible to use a foreign individual to advance white interests, sure. Why not.
Maybe after 100 years of no Jews in America we could use a few as entertainers or something like that; but because there are still treacherously naive whites who think in this individualistic way, allowing into our country a group that has been exploiting white good nature for 20 centuries is too dangerous.
"It is important to remember that Judaism is not Old Testament religion, but rather a rejection of the Biblical faith altogether in favor of the Pharisaical, Talmudic heresy.
Like Mormons, Jehovah’s Witnesses, the Unification Church, and other cults, it claims to be based on the Bible; but its actual authority comes from the traditions of men. Jesus was quite clear: Judaism denies Christ because it denies Moses. Orthodox Christianity alone is the true continuation and fulfillment of Old Testament religion (see Matt. 5:17-20; 15:1-9; Mark 7:1-13; Luke 16:29-31; John 5:45-47; 8:42-47).”
-- David Chilton, Paradise Restored, Ch.20