Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Rigobert's avatar

"Owing to my theological position on the present status of Authority in the Catholic Church, The Cassiaciacum Thesis, I do not regard Fr. Maximillian Kolbe to be a Saint, publicly. This is not to be viewed as a “knock” against him or an “insult” to his legacy."

I am asking because I do not fully understand your position, but how do you reconcile your theological position with our Lord's words, "the gates of Hell will not prevail against it [the Church]."?

Who is the visible head of the Church Jesus founded, if not the Bishop of Rome? If there is no valid Bishop of Rome then there is no Church, no Apostolic Succession, and there never was. So if not Leo XIV, then who is the valid Bishop of Rome?

It has been prophesied by some mystics that Rome would lose the Faith, and all will appear lost. It appears this may have already come to pass, if your theological position is the correct one, OR it is very soon to happen... I am not certain which is correct, but the "Pontificate" of Francis introduced confusion and division rather than "confirming his brothers in the faith", like no other pontificate in the history of the Church.

If Rome loses the faith as prophesied, who carries the torch going forward? Obviously, when the Jews lost the faith, the Gentiles were chosen to carry the torch from the capitol of the Roman Empire. There is always a Divine Plan. The Magisterium is supposed to have a visible head. I have heard stories of Islamists in the Middle East converting to Christianity through mystical experiences, not unlike the Apostle Paul, being visited by Jesus.

Sandra Elam's avatar

I want to thank you for publishing this series on Fr. Kolbe's writings. Even though his warnings about the Synagogue of Satan (Rev. 2:9 & 3:9) aka Freemasonry were written 100 years ago, they are still relevant today.

37 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?